The Supreme Court questioned the Centre on the constitutional validity of the sedition law, which has existed since the colonial-era.
The Chief Justice of India asked if the law which was used by the British to silence Gandhi was still needed after 75 years of Independence.
The apex court’s strong message came after a fresh plea by a former army officer challenging the Constitutional validity of the sedition law on the ground that it causes “chilling effect” on speech and is an unreasonable restriction on free expression, a fundamental right.
The sedition Law (Sec.124A) was introduced in 1870. The offence is committed when any person brings or attempts to bring hatred or contempt, towards the government.
In 1962, after a plea by Kedar Nath Singh, questioning the law’s validity, Supreme Court upheld the law but restricted its scope saying ‘Any act that has the effect of destabilizing the govt. by violent means or creating public disorder would come within the definition of sedition.
A citizen has a right to criticize or comment about the Govt. and its steps. as long as there is no incitement of violence or creation of public disorder.
The Chief Justice questioned the Attorney General on why this law was required after 75 years of independence.
Also following observations were made:
(Sources: India today)
The University of Kashmir has invited eligible candidates for a walk-in interview for filling the…
Social media platforms have become breeding grounds for fraudulent job scams, with scammers exploiting unemployed…
Jammu and Kashmir’s Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha Saturday said that he is personally monitoring the…
Police on Saturday arrested a fair shop dealer over alleged sexual harassment of a minor…
National Investigation Agency on Saturday morning attached the residential house of an accused in connection…
Pakistani Dr Shahnaz Laghari is the world’s first Hijabi female pilot who flew an aircraft…