Celebrating Pakistan’s Win Over India Isn’t Sedition: Former Supreme Court Judge.

Celebrating Pakistan’s Win Over India Isn’t Sedition: Former Supreme Court Judge.

A former Supreme Court judge Justice  Deepak Gupta has said that that celebrating a rival team’s victory is “not sedition”.

In a 18-minute interview to Karan Thapar for The Wire, Justice Gupta went further to say that celebrating a Pakistani victory over India may be offensive or unwise “but it is not a crime, it is not illegal”. As he explained: “A thing may be good or bad but that does not make it a crime or illegal”.

He added: “All legal actions are not necessarily good or moral” and then pointed out, “we are governed by a rule of law not a rule of morals”.

In The Wire interview, Justice Gupta also made clear that none of the other three charges brought against the Kashmiri students in Agra apply. 

Speaking in detail about the sedition charge, Justice Gupta said if the Chief Minister or his office had gone through the earlier Supreme Court judgements on sedition they would have known that what the Kashmiri students in Agra did is definitely not sedition.

The trio—Arsheed Yusuf, Inayat Altaf Sheikh and Showkat Ahmed Gilani—are students of Raja Balwant Singh Engineering Technical College in Agra. Following their campus suspension, they were booked for sedition by Uttar Pradesh Police on the instructions of Yogi Adityanath led government.

Legal experts argue that the cases are completely untenable and that celebrating the result of a cricket match cannot be a criminal activity.

Therefore, the tweet from the Chief Minister’s office stating that these students will be charged with sedition is based upon ignorance of the law.

No Place For Sedition

Justice Gupta said: “Sedition has no place in a civilised democracy”. He said his preference – which he also expressed in an interview to The Wire in March 2021 – is for the sedition law to be immediately abolished.

However, if that does not happen he added: “The time has come for the Supreme Court to step-in and in no uncertain terms lay down if the law is valid or not and if it’s valid to specify what are its limitations and what guidelines must be followed.

Speaking about each of the other three charges the Kashmiri students in Agra face, Justice Gupta explained why they do not apply. First, with regard to Section 153A, which is about promoting enmity on grounds of religion, he said: “How does it (their alleged celebration) promote enmity?…Just because they belong to a particular religion? Have they said anything against Hinduism?”

No Case?

Responding to the fact the Agra students are also charged under Section 505(1)(b), which is about making statements that may induce others to commit an offence against the state or public tranquillity, Justice Gupta said: “They were celebrating not inciting anyone to commit an offence.”  He added that if someone is provoked it’s that person’s responsibility and it cannot be blamed on the students.

Finally, referring to the third charge the Agra students face, Section 66F of the IT Act, which is punishment for cyber-terrorism, Justice Gupta said: “How does cyber-terrorism come into it?” He pointed out that the students were celebrating. They did not tweet or use social media. In fact, Justice Gupta also pointed out the college authorities have said no slogans at all were raised.

INDIA